Is SOL debt clcleltiboe under the FDCPA today?These cases say that SOL debt is not clcleltiboe. How specific were the rulings of these cases and what do we need to know about them to make sure the SOL debt is still good paper to work.Harry W. Brink v. First Credit Resources, 185 F.R.D. 567, 1999 U.S.Dist.Lexis 15121 [U.S.D.C. Ariz. 1999]Taylor v. Unifund, No. 98-C-5921, 1999 U.S.Dist.Lexis 13651 [U.S.D.C. N.D. Ill. 1999]Wright v. Asset Acceptance Corp., C-3-97-375, 1999 U.S. Dist. Lexis 20675 [U.S.D.C. S.D. Ohio 2000]Canterbury v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, 2001 WestLaw 1681132 [U.S.D.C. S.D. Ohio 2001]Parretta v. Capital Acquisitions & Mngt. Co., 2003 WestLaw 21383757, 2003 U.S.Dist.Lexis 10070 [U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. 2003] This case held that even a phone call to the consumer in an attempt to collect a time-barred debt stated a claim under the FDCPA.I got these from a forum post on another site.
Is SOL debt clcleltiboe under the FDCPA today?These cases say that SOL debt is not clcleltiboe. How specific were the rulings of these cases and what do we need to know about them to make sure the SOL debt is still good paper to work.Harry W. Brink v. First Credit Resources, 185 F.R.D. 567, 1999 U.S.Dist.Lexis 15121 [U.S.D.C. Ariz. 1999]Taylor v. Unifund, No. 98-C-5921, 1999 U.S.Dist.Lexis 13651 [U.S.D.C. N.D. Ill. 1999]Wright v. Asset Acceptance Corp., C-3-97-375, 1999 U.S. Dist. Lexis 20675 [U.S.D.C. S.D. Ohio 2000]Canterbury v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, 2001 WestLaw 1681132 [U.S.D.C. S.D. Ohio 2001]Parretta v. Capital Acquisitions & Mngt. Co., 2003 WestLaw 21383757, 2003 U.S.Dist.Lexis 10070 [U.S.D.C. N.D. Cal. 2003] This case held that even a phone call to the consumer in an attempt to collect a time-barred debt stated a claim under the FDCPA.I got these from a forum post on another site.
Caller type: Sociopath
Caller: Rita
Company: Is SOL debt clcleltiboe under the FDCPA todayThese cases say that SOL debt is n
Number: 203-713-2679